NOTE: Why not use our List Manager to crack your lists? Its easy and enables better management.

NOTE: When cracking WPA/WPA2 passwords, make sure you check gpuhash.me first incase it's already been processed.

Home - General Discussion - Comparaison CudaHashcat-plus 0.08 vs 0.07 ... !!!


10 Results - Page 1 of 1 -
1
Author Message
Avatar
hasheponge

Status: Elite
Joined: Fri, 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 1671
Team:
Reputation: 1117 Reputation
Offline
Wed, 02 May 2012 @ 16:32:49

@ALL for users who use cudahashcat-plus, i tested 0.07 and 0.08 with same script... same files and same rule, same GPU !
differents performances ! and the worst not the same result !!!!

Results :

with 0.07 :

Speed........: 612.6M c/s Real, 582.8M c/s GPU
Recovered....: 311/1441897 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress.....: 20132793600/80453034400 (25.02%)
Rejected.....: 4420537600/20132793600 (21.96%)

with 0.08 :

Speed........: 472.3M c/s Real, 485.6M c/s GPU
Recovered....: 7/1441897 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress.....: 20444744960/80453034400 (25.41%)
Rejected.....: 4420537600/20444744960 (21.62%)

0.08 -23% !! and curious Recovered !!! 0.07 = 311, 0.08 = 7 !!!

Blandyuk ? M@LIK, jtknapp ? Bug ?


Specs -
Nvidia 660 Ti - 470 GTX - Radeon 6950

Avatar
h0wler

Status: Elite
Joined: Tue, 08 Nov 2011
Posts: 309
Team:
Reputation: 257 Reputation
Offline
Wed, 02 May 2012 @ 16:37:22

Strange...what version of the drivers are you using?

hasheponge said:

@ALL for users who use cudahashcat-plus, i tested 0.07 and 0.08 with same script... same files and same rule, same GPU !
differents performances ! and the worst not the same result !!!!

Results :

with 0.07 :

Speed........: 612.6M c/s Real, 582.8M c/s GPU
Recovered....: 311/1441897 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress.....: 20132793600/80453034400 (25.02%)
Rejected.....: 4420537600/20132793600 (21.96%)

with 0.08 :

Speed........: 472.3M c/s Real, 485.6M c/s GPU
Recovered....: 7/1441897 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress.....: 20444744960/80453034400 (25.41%)
Rejected.....: 4420537600/20444744960 (21.62%)

0.08 -23% !! and curious Recovered !!! 0.07 = 311, 0.08 = 7 !!!

Blandyuk ? M@LIK, jtknapp ? Bug ?


BTC: 16c3rG8EwyNXHDKtCWPtediC3NrVUQhu7M

Avatar
hasheponge

Status: Elite
Joined: Fri, 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 1671
Team:
Reputation: 1117 Reputation
Offline
Wed, 02 May 2012 @ 16:38:19

The last Drivers and Cuda nvidia...
this test with 32 bits win 7

jtknapp said:

Strange...what version of the drivers are you using?

hasheponge said:

@ALL for users who use cudahashcat-plus, i tested 0.07 and 0.08 with same script... same files and same rule, same GPU !
differents performances ! and the worst not the same result !!!!

Results :

with 0.07 :

Speed........: 612.6M c/s Real, 582.8M c/s GPU
Recovered....: 311/1441897 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress.....: 20132793600/80453034400 (25.02%)
Rejected.....: 4420537600/20132793600 (21.96%)

with 0.08 :

Speed........: 472.3M c/s Real, 485.6M c/s GPU
Recovered....: 7/1441897 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress.....: 20444744960/80453034400 (25.41%)
Rejected.....: 4420537600/20444744960 (21.62%)

0.08 -23% !! and curious Recovered !!! 0.07 = 311, 0.08 = 7 !!!

Blandyuk ? M@LIK, jtknapp ? Bug ?


Specs -
Nvidia 660 Ti - 470 GTX - Radeon 6950

Avatar
hasheponge

Status: Elite
Joined: Fri, 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 1671
Team:
Reputation: 1117 Reputation
Offline
Wed, 02 May 2012 @ 16:47:24

I try to reinstall my drivers... a re-tested....


Specs -
Nvidia 660 Ti - 470 GTX - Radeon 6950

Avatar
M@LIK

Status: n/a
Joined: Fri, 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 558
Team:
Reputation: 208 Reputation
Offline
Wed, 02 May 2012 @ 16:50:22

Hmmm... weirdo -_-
Maybe we should let atom see this.
But I believe you're doing something wrong my friend.


Avatar
hasheponge

Status: Elite
Joined: Fri, 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 1671
Team:
Reputation: 1117 Reputation
Offline
Wed, 02 May 2012 @ 16:59:36

:-( after reinstall drivers (296.10) no change !!!

0.08 :

Speed........: 445.5M c/s Real, 459.8M c/s GPU
Recovered....: 6/1441897 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress.....: 20472401984/80453034400 (25.45%)
Rejected.....: 3341684800/20472401984 (16.32%)

0.07 :

Speed........: 545.6M c/s Real, 594.9M c/s GPU
Recovered....: 307/1441897 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress.....: 20465061952/80453034400 (25.44%)
Rejected.....: 3341684800/20465061952 (16.33%)

!!! strange is "Recovered" !!!

Hashs ; MD5 (file 32_hex) , Rule : d3ad0ne.rule
GPU for this test : GTX 470 , win 7-32bits

strange....

M@LIK said:

Hmmm... weirdo -_-
Maybe we should let atom see this.
But I believe you're doing something wrong my friend.


Specs -
Nvidia 660 Ti - 470 GTX - Radeon 6950

Avatar
M@LIK

Status: n/a
Joined: Fri, 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 558
Team:
Reputation: 208 Reputation
Offline
Wed, 02 May 2012 @ 17:03:45

@hasheponge:: Open a new thread here.


Avatar
hasheponge

Status: Elite
Joined: Fri, 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 1671
Team:
Reputation: 1117 Reputation
Offline
Wed, 02 May 2012 @ 17:09:40

I posted ...

M@LIK said:

@hasheponge:: Open a new thread here.


Specs -
Nvidia 660 Ti - 470 GTX - Radeon 6950

Avatar
M@LIK

Status: n/a
Joined: Fri, 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 558
Team:
Reputation: 208 Reputation
Offline
Wed, 02 May 2012 @ 17:15:21

hasheponge said:

I posted ...

Very good. Now you will get support by atom himself : )


Avatar
hasheponge

Status: Elite
Joined: Fri, 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 1671
Team:
Reputation: 1117 Reputation
Offline
Wed, 02 May 2012 @ 17:41:02

I tested with my second GPU (GTS 450) same results... :-(

M@LIK said:

hasheponge said:

I posted ...

Very good. Now you will get support by atom himself : )


Specs -
Nvidia 660 Ti - 470 GTX - Radeon 6950


10 Results - Page 1 of 1 -
1

We have a total of 187861 messages in 23289 topics.
We have a total of 21126 registered users.
Our newest registered member is billdiggy.